<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 25 seconds in Spa</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pmtate.co.uk/2008/09/25-seconds-in-spa/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pmtate.co.uk/2008/09/25-seconds-in-spa/</link>
	<description>PMTate BSc FCA Website</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 18:22:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.pmtate.co.uk/2008/09/25-seconds-in-spa/comment-page-1/#comment-41</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 13:34:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pmtate.co.uk/2008/09/25-seconds-in-spa/#comment-41</guid>
		<description>Found the transcript of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fia.com/en-GB/the-fia/court_appeal/judgments/Documents/12-10-2007-ica-ToroRosso-a.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;original Toro Rosso case &lt;/a&gt;and lo it says:
&lt;blockquote&gt;Having acknowledged that the due hearing of all parties was in order, that the appeal
was admissible, that the rights of each of the parties had been duly examined both in
the proceedings which preceded the hearing and during the hearing itself, that the
appealing competitor, the intervenor and the knowledgeable parties were duly heard,
and provided all the detailed explanations requested from them during the hearing and
provided answers&lt;/blockquote&gt;
So whilst the previous decision declares an appeal is admissible, the FIA later decide that the World Motor Sport Council must have made a mistake and does not set a precedent? Unless I have misunderstood?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Found the transcript of the <a href="http://www.fia.com/en-GB/the-fia/court_appeal/judgments/Documents/12-10-2007-ica-ToroRosso-a.pdf" rel="nofollow">original Toro Rosso case </a>and lo it says:</p>
<blockquote><p>Having acknowledged that the due hearing of all parties was in order, that the appeal<br />
was admissible, that the rights of each of the parties had been duly examined both in<br />
the proceedings which preceded the hearing and during the hearing itself, that the<br />
appealing competitor, the intervenor and the knowledgeable parties were duly heard,<br />
and provided all the detailed explanations requested from them during the hearing and<br />
provided answers</p></blockquote>
<p>So whilst the previous decision declares an appeal is admissible, the FIA later decide that the World Motor Sport Council must have made a mistake and does not set a precedent? Unless I have misunderstood?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
